Skip to main content

Brain Scans Show Early Signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Posted on by Dr. Francis Collins

Unhappy baby

Source: Getty Images

For children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), early diagnosis is critical to allow for possible interventions at a time when the brain is most amenable to change. But that’s been tough to implement for a simple reason: the symptoms of ASD, such as communication difficulties, social deficits, and repetitive behaviors, often do not show up until a child turns 2 or even 3 years old.

Now, an NIH-funded research team has news that may pave the way for earlier detection of ASD. The key is to shift the diagnostic focus from how kids act to how their brains grow. In their brain imaging study, the researchers found that, compared to other children, youngsters with ASD showed unusually rapid brain growth from infancy to age 2. In fact, the growth differences were already evident by their first birthdays, well before autistic behaviors typically emerge.

Autism spectrum disorder includes a range of developmental conditions, such as autism and Asperger syndrome, that are characterized by challenges in social skills and communication. Scientists have long known that teens and adults with ASD have unusually large brain volumes. Researchers, including Heather Hazlett and Joseph Piven of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, found more than a decade ago that those differences in brain size emerge by about age 2 [1]. However, no one had ever visually tracked those developmental differences.

In the new study reported in Nature [2], Hazlett, Piven, and their colleagues set out to collect that visual evidence. They examined 106 infants at high risk of ASD, based on an older sibling with that diagnosis. Fifteen of the study’s high-risk infants went on to be diagnosed with ASD at age 2. The study also included another 42 infants with no family history of ASD and a low risk for the disorder. In all groups, the infants were mostly white, had similar birth weights, and comparable family backgrounds.

Each infant underwent detailed behavioral assessments for early signs of ASD, such as trouble babbling or making eye contact, at 6, 12, and 24 months of age. At each visit, the researchers also used a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner to capture detailed images of each child’s brain while napping.

Between the first and second scans, or just 6 to 12 months into the study, the MRIs showed something remarkable. There was a significant increase in the surface area of the brains of kids who would later develop ASD compared to other children. By age 2, the brains of these kids were obviously larger. The researchers found that kids whose brains grew the fastest also had the most severe social deficits.

But could these observations be translated into early diagnosis? To begin looking for an answer, the researchers turned to machine learning. They wanted to find out whether a computer could use features captured in those MRI scans, including the surface area and volume of the brain, to predict accurately which kids would develop ASD and which ones wouldn’t. They found that 8 times out of 10, the computer got it right. Importantly, the computer-derived algorithm relied primarily on the changes in brain surface area between the ages of 6 months and 1 year to make those calls .

If the new findings can be confirmed in more children, it may lead to a much-needed new approach to early diagnosis for kids at high risk of ASD. Piven says the findings also highlight that ASD doesn’t occur suddenly and spontaneously, as sometimes incorrectly thought. Rather, the disorder develops over time—beginning in the first year of life or likely earlier—from genetic and environmental influences that the North Carolina team and others are working hard to understand.

Why should the development of a larger brain lead to ASD? We don’t really know yet. Perhaps in the process of molding the brain for optimum function, it’s not just the expansion of neurons and synaptic junctions that matter, but also the “pruning” that allows this complex network—the most complicated structure in the known universe—to achieve maximum efficacy for human abilities and social interactions.The findings also add to evidence from studies in mice that ASD may be related to abnormalities in the progenitor cells that allow the brain to grow [3]. The hope is that, as more is learned about ASD’s underlying biology, researchers will make even greater strides toward improving its diagnosis and discovering entirely new kinds of treatments to help these kids and their parents.


[1] Magnetic resonance imaging and head circumference study of brain size in autism: birth through age 2 years. Hazlett HC, Poe M, Gerig G, Smith RG, Provenzale J, Ross A, Gilmore J, Piven J. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1366-76.

[2] Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. Hazlett HC, Gu H, Munsell BC, Kim SH, Styner M, Wolff JJ, Elison JT, Swanson MR, Zhu H, Botteron KN, Collins DL, Constantino JN, Dager SR, Estes AM, Evans AC, Fonov VS, Gerig G, Kostopoulos P, McKinstry RC, Pandey J, Paterson S, Pruett JR, Schultz RT, Shaw DW, Zwaigenbaum L, Piven J; IBIS Network; Clinical Sites; Data Coordinating Center; Image Processing Core; Statistical Analysis.Nature. 2017 Feb 15;542(7641):348-351.

[3] Regulation of cerebral cortical size by control of cell cycle exit in neural precursors. Chenn A, Walsh CA. Science. 2002 Jul 19;297(5580):365-9.


Autism Spectrum Disorder (National Institute of Mental Health/NIH)

Infant Brain Imaging Study

Heather Hazlett (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)

Joseph Piven (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)

NIH Support: National Institute of Mental Health; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering


  • johnfett says:

    I want to share my story with you. My youngest son was the brightest, smartest sweetest child ever. He had a 15 word vocabulary at 15 months old. He tested out at 24 months old at 15 months. He teased, he was so happy. His head circumference was in the 50th percentile that day. In a previous brain scan his brain size was normal. Then we vaccinated him. He seized. Started the highest pitched shrillest scream I’ve ever heard and I have 9 children. In less than 3 hours he couldn’t walk or talk, he screamed. They tell you to get immediate medical attention if they have high pitched screaming. Most people I know who’ve been through the exact same thing as us are all told similar things. He’s a brat, he’s overreacting, you name it we hear it but no one helps you when your child is vaccine injured. You’re sent home to pray your child doesn’t die. In he next few weeks his head circumference exploded. It tested at 99th percentile 3 months later. The screaming continued. He had a vaccine injury. His neurosurgeon was furious. He sees it all the time. In this study were the moms receiving vaccines? Rhogam? Did they have amalgam fillings?

    For those of us with vaccine injured children who are now diagnosed with autism the one thing we ask over and over again is when will we be heard? When will someone explain to us how putting aborted fetal RNA, mercury and aluminum and adjuvants known to cause infertility into the bodies of small children is safe? It almost feels like a sick joke to me. Why are we ignored? Why are hundreds of thousands of parents ignored? Why is it what happened to our children unimportant? Who our son was died that day. He died. We got a new child. Who he was was murdered so others could make money. That’s the bottom line. When will studies showing no link to autism and vaccines that we now know we’re doctored be removed from journals? How many more unborn babies will intentionally be delivered alive, harvested and turned into new human diploid cell lines? This happened in China where many countries get vaccines from! Help us! Please don’t ignore us. We’ve been ignored for far to long. Keep in mind what happened to cigarettes and one can see the parallel to vaccines.

    • Ray says:

      Anecdotal evidence is not comparable to large scale, double blind studies which move on to extensive peer review.

    • Mark Heatherbell says:

      Your observations of your son sound genuine, and I think mercury is most responsible. Was there mercury thermiserol in the vaccine ? Infant immunity cant cope with multitasking, being injected with poison, and bits of pathogen at the same time.

  • Andrea says:

    What is your mention of Rhogam about. If the mother was given rhogam ? Or it’s included childrens vaccine?

Leave a Comment