Skip to main content

NIH Comment Policy

You are encouraged to share your thoughts and ideas on this website, or any other website owned or administered by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) where commenting is supported. However, NIH blogs are not intended to serve as public forums. The views expressed in the Comments section reflect those of the individual(s) who authored the comment(s) and may not reflect those of NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Due to the fact that NIH utilizes moderated blogs, comments submitted for consideration are not immediately visible. All comments are reviewed before they can be posted to ensure compliance with this policy. Be advised that NIH does not plan to respond to individual comments or questions on a routine basis.

Our comment policy is designed to encourage respectful and constructive dialogue. Comments that include the following are prohibited:

  • Vulgar, obscene, profane, threatening, or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind
  • Discriminatory language (including hate speech) based on race, national origin, age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or disability
  • Endorsements of commercial products, services, organizations, or other entities
  • Repetitive posts (for example, if you submit the same idea multiple times)
  • Spam or undecipherable language (gratuitous links will be viewed as spam)
  • Copyright infringement
  • Links to external sites
  • Solicitation of funds
  • Procurement-sensitive information related to any current/future NIH acquisition
  • Surveys, polls, and questionnaires subject to the Office of Management and Budget Paperwork Reduction Act clearance
  • Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or Sensitive Information (SI)
  • Off-topic posts
  • Reporters’ questions – all media inquiries must be directed to the NIH Office of Communications and Public Liaison

We ask that your comments be respectful and relevant to the specific blog topic. We welcome your comments at any time. However, given the need to responsibly manage federal resources, the reviewing and posting of comments will occur Monday through Friday during regular business hours.

In submitting your comments to an NIH website, you irrevocably grant NIH permission to copy, distribute, make derivatives, display, or perform your work publicly and free-of-charge.

Reporters are asked to send questions to the NIH media office through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Media inquiries will not be posted or answered.

Thank you for taking the time to review our comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to hearing from you.

192 Comments

  • TA says:

    Thank you, but I can see that everyone is commenting on the comment policy.

  • Waqas Majeed says:

    Thanks for stating the appropriate manners required to use this website

  • gamiskuu says:

    Hello, nice post and thank You giving such an amazing information.

  • Ken says:

    I enjoyed the interview with Dr. Eliseo Perez-Stable, the NIMHD director. I thought it is interesting to note that mitigation interventions like physical distancing is just alien to the black community regardless of how it is communicated. Being close to others is one of the things that has been integral to black folk survival in this beloved United States of America. Look at what is going on right now with the black community? Go and be by myself? Science needs to communicate ways of how to be together WITH physical distancing. This is where the social sciences might provide insight. What does that look like? How do you communicate this to different communities? I’d like to see a pilot program where the government/NIH? procures RVs or some type of mobile mini hospitals or care units. Staff them with people who look like the people in the communities that they go into. These RVs would provide testing and consultation etc.

    Of course, for those who are COVID positive there needs to be a protocol in place (next steps, where to go etc.) If the black and brown community can’t go to the hospital, then we should take the hospital to those communities. That idea seems impossible though because this type of intervention has to be intentional and will take $. Just my 2 cents…

  • de says:

    I like this post …

  • L.A.P. says:

    I think that disparities start when we still have the same criteria we have been using for almost a century to evaluate demographic statistics dealing with disease, epidemics, and pandemics. I have patients who are black with cardiovascular and diabetes disease and against the suggestion of using masks and keeping the social distance, but they have not been infected with the SARS CoV 2. They are religious people who, because churches and temples are closed, get together in family residences to worship. They participate in programs to provide food and spiritual support to those who are in need. How do we explain those cases statistically? Might it be because consciously they vibrate in a different frequency from the COVID-19 disease? Could we eliminate disparities if we include consciousness no as an epiphenomenon but as central dogma in our criteria of researches? Scientific evidence match with that possibility. Perhaps in that way, we have the hold picture of the event and can design a better plan to fight the pandemic.

  • ls123 says:

    thanks for sharing this wonderful article …

  • Mel Marin says:

    The summer intern program was killed by the COVID. So it is a great thing Dr. Jackie Newell is doing to train an entire nation of students who want to learn how to pursue their science dreams by offering web seminars on pursuing a science career for anyone in lieu of the summer program.   It is way better than a few elite students who are already trained getting a handful of slots for a summer program to train them even more, because this way you teach those who never got the good training and are clueless about the next steps.    I think she has transformed a blah blah job into a very important thing with national scope.   It is more then turning a lemon into lemonade. It is a grapefruit now. If I had a hat it would be “hat’s off” to her citric acid.

  • S.D.C. says:

    Thanks for sharing this information this is very helpful for everyone and i really appreciate your hard work and dedication and also thanks for effort to write this blog …

  • Rony says:

    Amazing Post. In any case, I am satisfied with the papers which have important and informative remarks. …

  • Hindi Sagar says:

    Excellent website. More useful information is available here.

  • Tumpa says:

    … Thank you very much for your message …

  • BH says:

    Good article … It was a nice post

  • bobbiesjackson says:

    Thank you for the useful information..

  • Tom Lemczyk says:

    1. Am just wondering, technically about Moderna and Pfizer-Biontech vaccines. Being of engineering background, I checked the constituent components of each vaccine, and have not clearly resolved why the Pfizer requires the ULTRA cold initial storage? Freezing point of only certain components (lNaCl and lipids) indicate about -21C, so given a +-10C margin, why couldnt it be stored at -30 to -40C (within capability of standard r404a refrigeration systems) rather than the callout for -60 to -80C (ie -70C nominal), thus necessitating the ULT freezer types (ie cascade refrigeration systems, or CO2 or LN2) ? Not having solid bioscience background, i’m thinking this may be due to pH levels needing to be maintained?
    2. Couldn’t storage at intermediate (ie -30 to -40C) cold temps allow perhaps 15-20 days local storage (before final transfer to normal refrigerator and thawing, thus 5days to shot usage as is announced)?
    The MRNA vaccine from what I could tell only had the lipid (w/polyethylene glycol…) freeze point of -10C …so makes sense that their calling for about -20C storage aligns (with +-10C margin).
    Thanks if there is any feedback to share!

  • Connie says:

    Since having covid last summer (mild case) (July/august 2020) it took 5 months to get taste and smell back and it still comes and goes. My nose was stuffed up all those months and despite Flonase and afrin nothing worked. Miserable every day with nasal congestion. But I have found that I’m in a state of constant anhedonia. Nothing makes me happy anymore. I travel to Mexico at least twice a year and have always counted the days until I left on my vacations. Since I’ve had covid even that doesn’t bring joy or happiness. I still go but it’s not like before. I’m not depressed. I just don’t feel emotionally like I used to. I have no desire to do anything except go to work which is a necessity and I have to push myself everyday to do that. Once I’m at work I’m ok. Then I come home and I don’t want to go anywhere. I was never like this before I got covid.

  • joe barbosa says:

    Is brown fat associated with longevity ?

  • Chris says:

    Heat recovery ventilators could reduce indoor human to human transmission of covid19 by mechanically exchanging the indoor air with outdoor air while saving energy. This simple device could save a lot of lives when people have to work together indoors, otherwise the health and financial cost of heating vs leaving windows open to allow air exchange may be astronomical.

  • clip says:

    This blog is helpful for everyone who needs help.

  • khel says:

    Thank you for posting such amazing information . . .

  • 1 7 8 9 10

Leave a Reply to gamiskuu Cancel reply