NIH Comment Policy
You are encouraged to share your thoughts and ideas on this website, or any other website owned or administered by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) where commenting is supported. However, NIH blogs are not intended to serve as public forums. The views expressed in the Comments section reflect those of the individual(s) who authored the comment(s) and may not reflect those of NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Due to the fact that NIH utilizes moderated blogs, comments submitted for consideration are not immediately visible. All comments are reviewed before they can be posted to ensure compliance with this policy. Be advised that NIH does not plan to respond to individual comments or questions on a routine basis.
Our comment policy is designed to encourage respectful and constructive dialogue. Comments that include the following are prohibited:
- Vulgar, obscene, profane, threatening, or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind
- Discriminatory language (including hate speech) based on race, national origin, age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or disability
- Endorsements of commercial products, services, organizations, or other entities
- Repetitive posts (for example, if you submit the same idea multiple times)
- Spam or undecipherable language (gratuitous links will be viewed as spam)
- Copyright infringement
- Links to external sites
- Solicitation of funds
- Procurement-sensitive information related to any current/future NIH acquisition
- Surveys, polls, and questionnaires subject to the Office of Management and Budget Paperwork Reduction Act clearance
- Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or Sensitive Information (SI)
- Off-topic posts
- Reporters’ questions – all media inquiries must be directed to the NIH Office of Communications and Public Liaison
We ask that your comments be respectful and relevant to the specific blog topic. We welcome your comments at any time. However, given the need to responsibly manage federal resources, the reviewing and posting of comments will occur Monday through Friday during regular business hours.
In submitting your comments to an NIH website, you irrevocably grant NIH permission to copy, distribute, make derivatives, display, or perform your work publicly and free-of-charge.
Reporters are asked to send questions to the NIH media office through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Media inquiries will not be posted or answered.
Thank you for taking the time to review our comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to hearing from you.
After looking at a few of the articles on your web page, I really appreciate your technique of writing a blog.
What specifically did you like about it?
What specifically did you like about this blog post?
Asking questions are genuinely good thing if you are not understanding something completely, but this piece of writing provides fastidious understanding even.
My brother recommended I might like this web site.
He was totally right. This post actually made my day. Thanks!
I gotta favorite this internet site. It seems handy–very useful.
Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely useful information, especially the last part.
I stumbled over here from a different web page and thought I should check things out. I like what I see, so now I am following you.
Thanks so much for sharing such high-quality content. I have bookmarked this page and plan on coming back frequently.
wonderful issues …
Excellent items … You are making it entertaining and still take care to keep it sensible. I can’t wait to learn far more from you. This is really a wonderful web site.
OK, I will follow your rules.
Do questions from the general public count as reporter’s questions? (If so, sorry for breaking that rule)
nice sharing bro
When I came upon your site, I must say your webpage is really cool I just love the content, its outstanding ! I’m in a bit of a rush in this instance to completely read your blog but I have favorited it. I will be back when I free up some time. Bravo for a great site.
Thanks for the info…
Good Info…
A nice site. I appreciate the information. I might suggest that plants such as those in the Lemnaceae may be more useful for studying mineral uptake than Arabadopsis spp. This is so because one can easily clone and grow Lemna spp. in test tubes or flasks. They can reachmature stages in short periods, etc.
I must admit though that I worked with Lemna purpesilla 6746 a long time ago and went on to other fields. I am uncertain if it or other Lemnaceae accumulate Zinc but I am reasonably sure there are ways to induce them to do so
Ijust did a quick google of “Zinca and Lemna” and sure enough there exists quite a few relevant papers. I am reasonably sure the authors of the Aradosis papers are aware of the scientific data on heavy metal accumulation by aquatic plants such as Lemna and have good reason for selecting Aradopsis sp. for their investigations. GOOD LUCK .
OK, I will follow your rules.
The articles on your site are a reliable health source. Thanks for opening to the public.
Very nice article.
Thanks so much for sharing such high-quality content. I have bookmarked this page and plan on coming back frequently.